Jump to content
  • Why it's dumb to have a car payment and what to do instead

    Lets start with some facts. 85% of americans have car loans. Furthermore 430$ is the typical monthly payment and consumers in the united states borrow $34,635 on average for new automobiles as well as an average of $21,500 for used automobiles. I got these concerning facts from themakingofamillionaire.com and simplyinsurance.com. No matter if you like it or not, financing a car is pretty normal these days.
    But here's the problem with financing cars. The reason you're financing is most likely that you cannot afford to buy the vehicle outright with cash. In times where most americans do not even have 400$ saved up for an emergency this sounds about right, doesn't it? So what you're basically doing is buying something you cannot afford and also don't need. Well of course you need a car but you do not need a model where you have to borrow $34,635 or $21,500 in order to buy it. Especially since more expensive cars normally also result in more expensive maintenance and higher costs of ownership in general. Something you really don't want if you already have to borrow money in order to buy the car in the first place, right?
    So instead of financing and having an average monthly payment of 430$ that you really can't afford, what i would do instead is looking for a reliable and cheap (5000$ or whatever you can afford) used car from the 90s or 2000s. Once you found one, just buy it outright with cash. When living in the united states obvious choices would be toyotas or hondas but those tend to be more expensive because people know they're reliable and cheap to maintain.
    You might be able to find a better deal if looking for vehicles from domestic brands like chevrolet, pontiac, buick, ford, mercury, lincoln, dodge etc. because those aren't as popular. What you try to find is a well maintained vehicle in good condition, ideally with relatively low miles and best case scenario from an elderly person that took care of it. I would also recommend to buy from a private seller to get an even better price. Since you don't need financing you don't need to pay more at a dealership. (Don't count on warranties when buying a cheap used car)
    The good thing when considering something like a 1992 dodge intrepid or 1995 buick park avenue is that you can find great examples for very little money because nobody want's these cars. Other benefits include less competition and less dishonest sellers trying to rip you off. (Simply because there is no big market for these cars) You also don't have to sacrifice much since those cars usually come with AC, automatic, ~200hp engines, leather interior, cruise control, power windows etc.
    Now that you have no car payment anymore this means you save - going by the average - 430$ each month. Let's say you invest those 430$ every month in an S&P 500 ETF (like VOO) that on average returns 10% per year (some years more, some years less) and you do that for a timespan of 10 years. After that you would have approximately $87,742.02 instead of wasting your money on car payments. If you did the same for 30 years you would have approximately $901,598.68. That's almost a million vs. nothing because you decided to have car payments instead.
    Conclusion
    So there you have it. Car payments can cost you a fortune and keep people from building wealth. Because of that i recommend you exchange yours for an affordable used car (paid for in cash) ASAP then start building wealth. Of course you can always buy a nicer car later once you saved up enough to buy it outright with cash. With that being said, many cheap used cars from the 90s and 2000s are actually pretty nice. You might be surprised what you can actually get for as little as 5000$. To sum it up, you can literally choose between becoming wealthy or ending up with a heavily depreciated vehicle worth almost nothing. Which do you pick? Let me know in the comments section below.

    0 comments
    266 views

    You can't beat the casino! Here's how to win anyway...

    First off, i'm not really much of a gambler myself. But over the years i met quite a few people who are and i also love las vegas (for other reasons) so i have seen quite a few casinos from the inside and done quite a bit of gambling myself. Doesn't matter if craps, roulette, poker, blackjack, slots or even sports betting. I have made my experiences with all of them. While i've always seen this as "weekend fun" (just like going to a club) and never betted with indispensable money i still tried to figure out a way to beat the casino and make bank. But at some point, after probably more than a decade trying to figure out a system that works i realized that it's just not possible. Keep on reading and i tell you why and how you can make a profit anyway...
    The most obvious reason why you can't win at a game of chance in the long run (that pretty much everybody knows) is the odds are always in favor of the bank (aka the casino). So if you're just playing without a system, chances are the longer you play the more money you will loose.
    But this leads me to the second reason as to why you can't win in the long run. Because IMHO there is no working system. Other people that are way more knowledegable than me when it comes to math and statistics also tried and also failed. Don't expect it to be as easy as googling "roulette system" and then you're smarter than everyone else at the casino because now all you have to do is put money on red and then double for as long until you win. That stuff doesn't work. And that's just an example. Complex systems don't work either. Ask me how i know. My guess is that either the casinos invented those systems themself in order to attract more customers or broke gamblers invented them in order to fund their addiction.
    And let's face it. If you could really figure out a system that works then casinos would ban you from their propertys pretty fast. That's exactly what happened to people counting cards which by the way doesn't work anymore because casinos nowadays have automatic card shufflers and exchange the card decks frequently. Since today casinos are connected through an international network you also can't just travel around to overcome this issue. Well it's just as they say, the house always wins!
    Bonus reason: Well based on my gut feeling after gambling on weekends and vacations for over a decade now - i think that some casinos on top of that actively decrease your chances of winning. I'm not saying it's all of them and i also do not have any proof for that at all. Just be aware of the fact that every game at a casino can in fact be manipulated and in many different ways. It's not just slot machines. Table games can be manipulated aswell. Of course chances of that happening to you are even higher in illegal facilities. I never participated in and based on stories i've been told would also highly recommend staying ouf of those.
    The good news is that you can use all this to your advantage and make a profit (win) anyway! As we discovered, going to a casino and make a bunch of money by using a fancy system doesn't work. But what does work is being the casino yourself! Because as most people know, the house always wins. Pretty obvious right? Well odds are you maybe can't or don't want to deal with running a gambling business. It might be also pretty hard to open a new (online) casino as well as to attract enough customers depending on where you live. Well good thing is that it's not required to do any of that in order to cash in. It works but you don't have to go that route. What i do instead is investing in the casino industry by buying gambling stocks. You have a large variety of options. You can buy casino stocks (Example Stock: WYNN), REITs that specialise in gambling property (Example Stock: VICI), online gambling stocks or even stocks from companies that manufacture gaming supplies like slot machines. When doing this you should obviously know the basics about stock trading, do a lot of research and develop a strategy prior to buying into these companies. But if done right then your odds of making money in the long run are way better than those of anyone gambling at a casino. I by the way generally like to hold on to my stocks for longer periods of time and would advice against a "short-termed" daytrading like approach.
    Conclusion
    In my opinion it's not possible to make sustainable long term profits gambling at the casinos for the reasons provided above. The only way to make sustainable long term profits with gambling is being the casino yourself. You can start your own or buy into an existing (online) casino but this is only one way to do it. What i do instead is investing in gambling stocks. When doing this the odds are finally in your favor. But you still need a "system" (aka know what you're doing) in order to make that work. In the end it really comes down to the simple concept of "if you can't beat them, join them!"
    This article is also not meant to discourage anyone from going to a casino or even las vegas. Just be aware that you will most likely loose. So i recommend to only bet negligible amounts of money and to take advantage of free (or cheap) drinks and bufetts if available. Simply have a great time without spending too much. Doing this you can definitely have a lot of fun without breaking the bank.
    Last but not least: Doesn't matter if gambling at the casino or investing in gambling stocks. I strongly advice you never do it with borrowed money or indispensable income because this is a great way to get in trouble. Also payback any debt and take care of your retirement first. Investing in gambling stocks IMHO should not be part of someones retirement plan.

    0 comments
    251 views

    My top 5 favorite hotels in las vegas, nevada

    Boy i love las vegas. It's my favorite place in the world. With that said it might surprise you that i'm not even much of a gambler. But i'm a night owl so i love that everything is 24/7. Apart from obvious things like gambling, nightclubs, bars or shows you can also do stuff like going to a nice restaurant or buy some groceries at 3am. There aren't many places where you can do stuff like that. But las vegas is one of them. Correction, IMHO it's the best of them! With that said i guess my love for las vegas makes a lot more sense now. In case you want to visit las vegas chances are you will need a hotel room during your stay. Well, here are my top 5 favorite hotels in las vegas...
    My goal: The nicest, largest, clean, quiet and dark (with the shades closed) room in the best location possible while spending as little as possible.
    Nr.1: The Venetian & The Palazzo (At the Venetian) (Strip)
    This is the hotel i'm usually staying at when visiting las vegas. It's my favorite by far. In my opinion...
    Their base rooms are the best base rooms in all of las vegas They have a large variety of good restaurants They of course have a nice casino The rooms are clean The rooms are large With the shades closed, the rooms are dark The rooms are quiet The AC works great and the bed is comfy The room service is great The hotel is in the best possible location There's nothing to complain about really.
    Nr.2: Bellagio (Strip)
    While the base rooms are not as nice and large as those in the venetian/palazzo the hotel and especially the hotel's location is still very good otherwise. It's my alternative to the venetian (or palazzo) in case that's not an option but i still want to be in a prime location. In short, a great hotel but value wise not as good as the venetian.
    Nr.3: Trump International Hotel (Off Strip)
    Yes the location isn't as great as the venetian or bellagio. It's arguably not even as good as a hotel on the fremont street. They also do not have a casino. But the hotel itself is great and you can get very nice large rooms equipped with a kitchen (Something you do not get in many las vegas hotels) without having to spend too much. At the trump international tower you basically get great value for your money. It's also not far from the strip so using a taxi cab or uber you'll be there in no time. So in case my budget was somewhat on the tight side but i still wanted to stay at a fancy hotel then i would definitely stay here.
    Nr.4: Wynn (Strip)
    The wynn has a great location (just as good as the venetian or bellagio) and also nice rooms. It furthermore has a golf course amongst a variety of other great things. So why is it not ranked higher on this list? Well it's also pretty expensive and in case of the encore (the pricier one of the 2 buildings) many guests seem to be complaining about noise in the hotel reviews. So i see it as an alternative. But truth being told, i'm a bit worried regarding the noise complaints.
    Nr.5: El Cortez (Fremont Street)
    The las vegas strip is great. But maybe you're on a budget or plan on spending most or even all of your time on fremont street anyway. In this case i think the El Cortez Hotel and Casino is a great choice. In my opinion it's better than other hotels on fremont street because it's located on one end of the street. So just make sure to get a room not facing fremont street and it hopefully should be relatively quiet. I personally would avoid the cabana suites aswell because i do not like the modern decor. But that's just personal preference. Either way, staying at the el cortez can save you a tremendous amount of money and using a taxi cab or uber you can still be at the strip in virtually no time. The main street station on the other end of fremont street may be a possible alternative.
    If considering the el cortez you might want to check out their jackie gaughan suite which might be my favorite accomodation in all of las vegas. Certainly my favorite option on fremont street as long as price is not that much of an object.
    Conclusion
    So these are my top 5 favorite hotels in las vegas. Of course there are a lot more to choose from and for almost any budget as well as desires and needs. Do you agree with my picks? If not which are your favorites and why? Let me know in the comments section below.

    0 comments
    315 views

    Here's my problem with the circa hotel on las vegas fremont street

    I love las vegas and i love the fremont street. It's one of the few places still in existance that feel like you've travelled back in time. Like with classic cars the reason being is that the hotels and casinos aren't built to look but actually are old! And because i don't like modern pretty much anything i do LOVE that!
    But exactly that's my problem with the circa hotel and for the same matter the canaba suites @ the el cortez hotel or the viva vision led canopy. Those modern generic constructions (which i'm already not a big fan of on their own) IMHO do not fit the theme of the fremont street / old vegas. They're actually killing the vibe. The good news is that you can ignore the led roof for the most part (just don't look upwards) which being honest is at least beneficial in the rare case of rain or snow. You can also avoid staying at a cabana suite. But it's way harder to ignore the circa building walking down the street or looking outside your hotel rooms window. (Or even just looking at pictures or videos) In regards of the fremont street as a whole, it's not that bad yet but if this trend continues there might not be much of the old fremont street experience left at some point. I would hate to see that happen!
    Apart from that the circa hotel seems to be fine but appears pricy to me for what you're actually getting. It's probably a good choice if you're looking for this kind of hotel on the fremont street location but i personally think this could've been better if they would've designed it to cosmetically "fit into" the fremont street as well as offered somewhat more for the money. But on the other hand maybe circa is exactly what people want these days and nobody cares about the old vegas vibe anymore? Let me know what you think in the comments.

    0 comments
    293 views

    Let's gamble! My penny stock strategy explained...

    When it comes to the stock market, i generally think it's best to follow warren buffets advice of investing in an S&P 500 ETF like the Vanguard 500 Index Fund ETF (Symbol: VOO). In my opinion it's a great longterm option for retirement that requires almost no effort and has proofen to be safer, cheaper and more lucrative than most alternatives in the past. Especially since most investors and investment managers can't beat the S&P 500 in the long run. Unless you've got insider information i would not even bother try. (And that would be illegal)
    While this is great, the problem is that the S&P 500 only returns 10% per year on average. In some years you might even end up loosing money. So it takes a long time to really make bank. But in case your greedy and impatient don't worry. 😄 The stock market offers many different ways to potentially generate way higher returns than the S&P 500 and in a much shorter period of time. The downside is that this usually comes with way more risks. But if you're willing to take some chances: Here's what i do if i feel like gambling...
    So what i'd like to do in this case is looking for penny stocks (or really cheap 1-2$ stocks).
    Why penny stocks? Well because they tend to fluctuate in price way more and faster than higher priced stocks. This results in higher possible gains but also risk. You be also more likely to find something with lots of potential yet so far overlooked by the general public when dealing with penny stocks.
    I'm personally looking for those penny stocks that meet the following criteria:
    The company has been around for a long time (At least 10 year chart history) The stock price was way higher in the past (At least where you want it to be again) You think the company will not go bankrupt You fully analysed and understand the business You think the stock price has the potential to go up massively within the timeframe you plan on holding the stock Now you have to define "potential to go up massively" and "timeframe you plan on holding the stock" for yourself. I'm personally hoping for at least a 5x (ideally much more) and within 5 years max. (Ideally within months) when using this strategy. Obviously that won't happen with many of the stocks you buy and sometimes you might end up selling for a lower profit, to break even or even at a loss. You might hit it big with 1-2 stocks or decent as a group so you can afford to loose on a bunch of others. At the end of the day you're basically trying to win more than you loose.
    Of course you could ignore the first 2 criterias and buy into new businesses without any history. But this is even risikier since most new businesses fail. Yes businesses that exist for decades can also go bankrupt. But the risk is lower, especially if you're doing your homework.
    Important: Do not cash out just because you lost half your money, your set timeframe is over or there is a recession etc. If you cash out early there must be a very good reason for that. (Backed by numbers/facts not stories) So the media/experts saying there is a market crash coming isn't a good reason to freak out and sell.
    Tip: Stock screeners make it easy to find qualifying stocks. I like to use the free screener over at tradingview.com. Just apply some filters and go through the results. It's that easy!
    Conclusion
    This strategy is not as short-termed or risky as daytrading. But it's still a high risk strategy with matching high possible rewards in a comparably short period of time. I would not recommend you use this strategy with non disposable money. You may want to try it with a paper trading account instead of using real money first. If you hate risk, i would buy an S&P 500 ETF instead.
    Disclaimer: I'm not a financial advisor so this is merely my personal opinion and not to be seen as financial advice. You have to do your own due diligence when making investments and you're the only one responsible for the outcome of such investments.

    0 comments
    260 views

    What i would do if i had 10 or 20 million dollars

    I guess most of us from time to time think about what they would do if they somehow became rich. Of course the more money you have the more options you got. You can for example blow it all on girls, fancy cars, parties or invest so you can hopefully retire and do what you're really passionate about. Or pretty much anything in between. Here's what i would do with 10 or 20 million dollars...
    Note: The following strategy is custom tailored to my personal situation, goals and needs. I for example already have a paid off house and no debt. If you currently do not have those things i would recommend taking care of that stuff first and only invest the remaining balance. Also if you love your current job and have no desire to start your own business and/or travel a lot than there is absolutely no reason to quit/retire from that job. If possible, i would not tell anyone about your newly acquired wealth aswell. Because of that the following strategy is not meant to be a "one size fits all" solution but best used as a source of inspiration.
    What i would do with 10 million USD
    With inflation and greed, money unfortunately isn't worth nearly as much as it used to be. So while 10 million sounds like a lot at first it might not get you as far as you think depending on your goals. What i would do is to invest 50% (5 Million) in an S&P 500 ETF and the other 50% (5 Million) in buying income producing real estate with cash. (No debt) The strategy here would be creating enough safe & stable income so i can retire (meaning NOT BEING FORCED TO work anymore just to survive / being financially independent), live comfortably and pursue the things that i really want to do in life. At 10 million i feel this dave ramsey and warren buffett mashup strategy would be the best choice. With this strategy i think you should be able to quit your hated job even if you're only in your 20s. Why? Lets go a bit more into detail...
    The S&P 500 returned 10% on average for a very long time now. (I'm talking decades) Inflation was just 4% on average in that same period. Meaning on average you get 6% yearly return after accounting for inflation. At 5 million that would be 300k per year or 25k per month before taxes. If you could manage to live below that your money would not just keep up with inflation but actually still keep growing.
    But the S&P 500 will not return 10% every year. In fact in some years you will might even end up loosing money. And what if the us economy collapses? (Which is very unlikely but still...) That's why you should never put all your eggs in one basket. Hence lets add some real estate.
    With income producing real estate (in this situation, i'd prefer 1 or 2 local appartment complexes with no HOA that i can rent out) paid for in cash (no debt) you have a pretty safe storage of value (like gold) that over the long run usually appreciates in value while producing income in rent. You might be struggling a bit with tenants and repairs now and then but all in all it provides a second stream of income that's safe and reliable over the long run. If the S&P 500 is temporarily down because of a recession - instead of freaking out because all your money is in that one basket - you can still collect rent and live off that because people will always need a place to live. Just make sure to budget for necessary repairs or renovations when buying property. Have a good margin of safety. Also safe a sufficient portion of your rental income net profit for future repairs/renovations and emergencies instead of spending it all and you should be golden.
    That's the basic plan. Maybe i would invest a little less and buy a few things that i really want like a nice classic car for example but the vast majority would be invested as described above. Unless you plan on spending all your investment income (living paycheck to paycheck is never a good idea), you can save and treat yourself later step by step.
    What i would do with 20 million USD
    If i had 20 millions i would pretty much do the same as if i had 10 millions plus:
    Invest even more in local hoa free income producing real estate (Maybe in las vegas) Start a classic car and limousine business (Selling, Renting, Repairshop...) (Maybe in las vegas) Treat myself buying a large personal residence with space for my hobbies and some classic cars/equipment that i want) (Maybe in las vegas) Invest 1 million in small units of diamonds, gold etc. At this point i would think about relocating to las vegas, nevada (Because i love vegas and it has huge tax benefits aswell) Of course that specific business would be something i know about and like. You obviously could start any type of business you want or none at all if you had a net worth of 20 million usd. Needless to say you also don't have to move anywhere if you don't want to but las vegas has tax benefits as i said earlier so if you like it it's maybe worth considering in this case.
    Conclusion
    While more is always better, it is indeed possible to have a really good life with 10 or 20 million usd if invested right. (At least by my standards) Lots of people would utilize debt to maximize this money even further and to save taxes but i would be rather following dave ramsey's advice of playing it safe. With more money (50, 100 million etc.) comes more choices. But in the 10-20 million range i think the plan described above is pretty hard to beat as long as you're looking to play it safe.
    Disclaimer: I'm not a financial advisor so this is merely my personal opinion and not to be seen as financial advice. You have to do your own due diligence when making investments and you're the only one responsible for the outcome of such investments.

    0 comments
    258 views

    In some cases, utilizing debt instead of paying cash can result in a higher ROI. Here's why!

    Disclaimer: When it comes to finances i generally agree with dave ramsey's advice of avoiding debt (except for a mortgage to buy your own personal home) and to only buy things you can pay cash for aka afford. So since i'm generally anti debt, i wasn't familiar with the concept of increasing the return of an investment (ROI) utilizing debt until a good friend introduced it to me recently. And while in some cases it's definitely possible to boost your investment returns utilizing debt (and i show you how in just a second) i would still advice against it in most cases. Why? Because it also boosts your chances of loosing money or even - depending on the situation - going bankrupt. I'm also not a financial advisor so this is merely my personal opinion and not to be seen as financial advice. You have to do your own due diligence when making investments and you're the only one responsible for the outcome of such investments. Now with all that said, let me explain the theory behind own capital + debt = higher ROI than own capital alone...
    Lets say you're looking to invest 100k of your own capital and the investment return is 10% after 1 year. This means that after 1 year you made 10k profit and now have 110k total.
    But now lets say you make a bigger investment where your own 100k is only 50% of the total investment sum. So you take out a 5% interest loan to fund the other 50% of the investment. This investment also returns 10% after 1 year. At this point you would have invested 100k of your own money + 100k of the banks money (5% interest loan) for a total investment of 200k with a return of 10% after 1 year. 10% return on a 200k investment is 20k. But you have to subtract the 5% interest on the 100k loan which is 5k for a total profit of 15k.
    Result: In this scenareo your ROI would've been 10k without the use of debt and 15k with the use of debt. Utilizing debt you made 5k more on the same amount of your own money (100k) and in the same timeframe (1 year).
    Now lets go even bigger. Let's say your 100k is only 20% and you borrow the other 80% (400k) of the total investment sum. Your interest rate is still 5% and your investment return is still 10% after 1 year. 10% return on a 500k investment is 50k. But you have to subtract the 5% interest on the 400k loan which is 20k for a total profit of 30k.
    Result: In this scenareo your ROI would've been 10k without the use of debt and 30k with the use of debt. Utilizing debt you made 20k more on the same amount of your own money (100k) and in the same timeframe (1 year).
    Conclusion
    When utilizing debt it's not only possible to do bigger investments. The examples above proof that it's furthermore possible to get a much higher ROI when utilizing debt (and with that while paying interest) aswell. Since risk is also much higher, i suggest you only do this if you can EASILY (meaning it's not or almost not affecting your life) cover the full amount (own captial + loan) with your own equity in case something goes wrong. If you can't afford or don't want to risk loosing you should not invest with borrowed money IMHO.
    Reason being: Investing with borrowed money IS always high risk. No one can forecast the future. Just think about 2008, covid 19 etc. If you still want to take your chances, make sure to have the best possible odds, a good margin of safety and a fixed interest rate for as long as you need to pay off the loan assuming everything goes as planned. (Preferably longer) Obviously low interest rates (that do not eat away your additional profits) are essential for this to work aswell. At time of this writing (08/2023) you might struggle to find cheap enough credit. But not long ago it would have been very easy.

    0 comments
    257 views

    Muscle cars, pony cars, sports cars ... what do all these terms mean anyway?

    Note: Some cars fall in between multiple categories.
    Muscle car
    Muscle car is a term for high-performance American coupes, usually but not limited to rear-wheel drive and fitted with a high-displacement V8 engine. General Motors introduced the first proper muscle car in 1949. The term originated for 1960s and early 1970s special editions of mass-production cars which were designed for drag racing.
    The definition of muscle car is subjective and frequently debated. Muscle cars often have many of the following characteristics:
    A large V8 engine in the most powerful configuration offered for a particular model Rear-wheel drive Being manufactured in the United States in the 1960s or early 1970s (the specific year range of 1964–1973 is sometimes used) A relatively lightweight two-door body (opinions vary as to whether high-performance full-size cars, compacts, and pony cars qualify as muscle cars, as it is sometimes claimed that only intermediate cars can be considered muscle cars) An affordable price Being designed for straight-line drag racing, while remaining street legal. High-power pony cars are sometimes considered muscle cars, however personal luxury cars are often too expensive to be considered muscle cars. Sports cars and sports sedans are not usually considered muscle cars, since they are generally associated with circuit racing rather than drag racing. Muscle cars are an extension of the hot rodding philosophy of taking a small car and putting a large-displacement engine in it, for the purpose of increased straight-line speed.
    Muscle cars were originally referred to as "Supercars" in the United States, often (though not always) spelled with a capital S." From the mid-1960s to the mid-1970s, "dragstrip bred" mid-size cars were equipped with large, powerful V8 engines and rear-wheel drive were referred to as Supercars more often than muscle cars. An early example is the 1957 Rambler Rebel, which was described as a "potent mill turned the lightweight Rambler into a veritable supercar."
    In 1966, the supercar became an official industry trend" as the four domestic automakers "needed to cash in on the supercar market" with eye-catching, heart-stopping cars. Examples of the use of the supercar description for the early muscle models include the May 1965 Car Life road test of the Pontiac GTO along with how "Hurst puts American Motors into the Supercar club with the 390 Rogue" (the SC/Rambler) to fight in "the Supercar street racer gang" market segment, with the initials "SC" signifying SuperCar.
    The supercar market segment in the U.S. at the time included special versions of regular production models that were positioned in several sizes and market segments (such as the "economy supercar"), as well as limited edition, documented dealer-converted vehicles. However, the supercar term by that time "had been diluted and branded with a meaning that did not respect the unique qualities of the 'muscle car'."
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Pony car
    Pony car is an American car classification for affordable, compact, highly styled coupés or convertibles with a "sporty" or performance-oriented image. Common characteristics include rear-wheel drive, a long hood, a short decklid, a wide range of options to individualize each car and use of mass-produced parts shared with other models.
    The popularity of pony cars is largely due to the launch of the Ford Mustang in 1964.
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Sports car
    A sports car is a car designed with an emphasis on dynamic performance, such as handling, acceleration, top speed, or thrill of driving.
    Definitions of sports cars often relate to how the car design is optimised for dynamic performance, without any specific minimum requirements;
    Broader definitions of sports cars include cars "in which performance takes precedence over carrying capacity", or that emphasise the "thrill of driving" or are marketed "using the excitement of speed and the glamour of the (race)track" However, other people have more specific definitions, such as "must be a two-seater or a 2+2 seater" or a car with two seats only.
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Sporty car
    Term used to describe pretty normal vehicles which have been added some "sporty" touches. Cars like a pontiac fiero or a chevrolet cavalier z24 for example.
    Grand tourer (GT)
    A grand tourer (GT) is a type of sports car that is designed for high speed and long-distance driving, due to a combination of performance and luxury attributes. The most common format is a front-engine, rear-wheel-drive two-door coupé with either a two-seat or a 2+2 arrangement.
    The terms "grand tourer", "gran turismo", "grande routière", and "GT" are among the most misused terms in motoring. The grand touring designation generally "means motoring at speed, in style, safety, and comfort." "Purists define "gran turismo" as the enjoyment, excitement and comfort of open-road touring."
    According to Sam Dawson, News Editor of Classic Cars (magazine), "the ideal is of a car with the ability to cross a continent at speed and in comfort yet provide driving thrills when demanded" and it should exhibit the following:
    The engines "should be able to cope with cruising comfortably at the upper limits on all continental roads without drawbacks or loss of usable power." "Ideally, the GT car should have been devised by its progenitors as a Grand Tourer, with all associated considerations in mind." "It should be able to transport at least two in comfort with their luggage and have room to spare — probably in the form of a two plus two (2+2) seating arrangement." The design, both "inside and out, should be geared toward complete control by the driver." Its "chassis and suspension provide suitable handling and roadholding on all routes" during travels. Grand tourers emphasize comfort and handling over straight-out high performance or ascetic, spartan accommodations. In comparison, sports cars (also a "much abused and confused term") are typically more "crude" compared to "sophisticated Grand Touring machinery." However, the popularity of using GT for marketing purposes has meant that it has become a "much misused term, eventually signifying no more than a slightly tuned version of a family car with trendy wheels and a go-faster stripe on the side."
    Historically, most GTs have been front-engined with rear-wheel drive, which creates more space for the cabin than mid-mounted engine layouts. Softer suspensions, greater storage, and more luxurious appointments add to their driving appeal.
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Luxury car
    A luxury vehicle provides increased levels of comfort, equipment, amenities, quality, performance, and status relative to regular cars for an increased price.
    The term is subjective and reflects both the qualities of the car and the brand image of its manufacturer. Luxury brands rank above premium brands, though there is no fixed demarcation between the two.
    Traditionally, most luxury cars were large vehicles, though smaller sports-oriented models were always produced.
    Our Comment: Even more luxurious than a personal luxury car.
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Personal luxury car
    Personal luxury car is a North American car classification describing somewhat sporty, sophisticated mass-market Coupés that emphasized comfort over performance. The North American manufacturers most often combined engineering, design, and marketing to develop upscale, distinctive "platform sharing" models that became highly profitable.
    Personal luxury cars are mass-market vehicles that have a combination of Sports car and Luxury car characteristics, typically two-door coupés or convertibles, typically with a small rear seat not intended for regular use by adults. Personal luxury car designs emphasize comfort and convenience, often highly equipped with interior features that were either optional or not available on other models.
    In contrast to the European Grand tourer sporty luxury car, where high-speed performance was key, the American personal luxury car typically blunted performance by mating large engines to heavy vehicles. The cars were usually mass-produced and often shared major mechanical components with other models from the manufacturer to reduce production costs.
    Although luxury coupes had been produced in North America for several decades previously, the beginning of the "personal luxury car" genre is generally considered to have started in 1958, due to the success of the Ford Thunderbird (second generation) when it was redesigned from a two-seat car to a four-seat car. These changes shifted the Thunderbird's emphasis from sporting to comfort and luxury, and sales increased by 50 percent.
    Prior to the late 1970s, personal luxury cars were usually large, rear-wheel drive vehicles powered by large V8 engines. As a result of the downsizing trend in the American automotive industry during the late 1970s, many personal luxury cars have been produced as mid-size cars with six-cylinder engines and front-wheel drive. By the 21st century, the personal luxury market had largely disappeared as consumers migrated to other market segments.
    Source / More info: Wikipedia
    Regular car
    Term used to describe pretty normal cars that mostly non car people would have bought. Excluding compact cars. For example a 1973 Ford Galaxie 500.
    Compact car
    Term used to describe all small cars.
    More indepth info:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_car
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subcompact_car

    0 comments
    289 views
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.